For years, cryptocurrency sat outside most fraud investigations. That has changed. In its 2022 Report to the Nations, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners looked for the first time at how often crypto shows up in occupational fraud, and the answer was often enough to matter. It appeared in about 8 percent of the cases studied.
Crypto did not invent new crimes. It gave familiar ones a faster, harder-to-trace way to move money. Both of the main uses the report found are old frauds with a new tool.
how it actually gets used
In the ACFE's data, cryptocurrency showed up in two main ways. In roughly half of the crypto-linked cases it was the vehicle for bribes and kickbacks, because a wallet-to-wallet payment leaves less of a paper trail than a bank transfer. In a similar share of cases it was where stolen money went: a fraudster moves misappropriated funds into crypto to store them and put distance between the theft and the cash. A third, quieter version sits on the balance sheet, where crypto holdings are misstated because few readers know how to check them.
why the anonymity cuts both ways
The appeal to a fraudster is that crypto transactions do not carry a name. The catch is that most of them are recorded on a public ledger that never forgets. A transfer that felt anonymous at the time can often be followed later, address to address, by someone who knows how to read the chain. The difficulty is not that the trail disappears. It is that following it takes skills and tools ordinary bookkeeping does not include.
There is also a plain accounting problem. Crypto prices swing hard, so the value of a holding on the day it is recorded may bear little relation to its value a week later. A company that wants to flatter its balance sheet can pick the favorable date, or carry a token that has quietly become worthless at a price no one has tested. For an outside investor or a lender, that uncertainty is exactly what they are relying on the statements to have pinned down. Verifying that what the books claim actually exists, in a wallet the company controls, is now part of the work.
what this asks of a business
Most companies are not choosing to deal in crypto for its own sake. They get pulled in by a customer, a contractor, or a supplier who wants to pay or be paid that way. Once that happens, the usual controls do not fully cover it, and the people approving the transactions often do not understand them. A forensic accountant can set the guardrails: how crypto payments are approved, how holdings are recorded and verified, and how a transaction gets traced if something looks wrong.
None of this means a business should refuse crypto outright. It means treating it as what it is, a payment channel with real advantages in cross-border deals and real ways to be abused. The mistake is accepting it without anyone in the building who can tell a normal transaction from a suspicious one.
Seeing red flags like these in your own numbers?
A confidential consultation costs nothing and tells you where you stand.
What it means for your matter
Most engagements are not Enron. But the pattern is the same at every scale: a diverted vendor payment, a related party that shouldn't exist, revenue booked before it was earned, a reserve fund that never quite reconciles. The methods used to expose a multibillion-dollar fraud are the same methods that expose a bookkeeper skimming from a small business or a managing agent taking kickbacks from a co-op.
If something in your financial picture doesn't add up, the earlier a forensic accountant looks, the more of the trail survives. Documents get lost, memories fade, and money moves. The record is easiest to reconstruct while it is still fresh.
Think something's wrong with your numbers?
Talk to a forensic accountant. It's confidential, and there's no obligation.